Mail subscription vs RSS
I read an article yesterday about how much better e-mail subscriptions are compared to RSS. For some reason it seems like the author thinks it’s easier to overflow yourself with news in an RSS-reader than in your mail inbox.
But seriously, what is the difference? Why would it be smarter to use your mail inbox for both your mail and your news? Because I can only come up with negative thoughts about this:
- It’s harder to manage mail subscriptions, since your subscription is stored on another server. If you want to unsubscribe or edit your subscription, you have to either log in to a website or send a special mail back (which sometimes doesn’t work). In an RSS-reader, you just press “Unsubscribe” and you’re done, since what you’re subscribing is stored locally.
- I don’t trust anyone. How can I be sure that my e-mail won’t get filled with spam after I subscribe to your website?
- Why would I save time by using only my mail-application, instead of having my news in a news-reader (a.k.a. RSS-reader)? Isn’t it much easier to just ignore Google Reader when you’re at work but still have to use your mail. To have a special e-mail for work doesn’t count, because that would be the same thing as having another application for RSS.
- The article says “news readers breed disinterest”… But wouldn’t it be the same thing with my mail-application? Suddenly I maybe ignore the important mail to?
- The article also says that with e-mail subscriptions you don’t need the RSS-icon everywhere on your website. Well, a subscription form takes up much more space, since the RSS-icon shows up in the address-bar in all modern web browsers (so you don’t have to include it in your website if you don’t want to).
I think I’ll stick with my RSS reader.
